Towards accurate indel calling for oncopanel sequencing through an international pipeline competition at precisionFDA.

Accurately calling indels with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is critical for clinical application. The precisionFDA team collaborated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) and successfully completed the NCTR Indel Calling from Oncopanel Sequencing Data Challenge, to evaluate the performance of indel calling pipelines. Top performers were selected based on precision, recall, and F1-score. The performance of many other pipelines was close to the top performers, which produced a top cluster of performers. The performance was significantly higher in high confidence regions and coding regions, and significantly lower in low complexity regions. Oncopanel capture and other issues may have occurred that affected the recall rate. Indels with higher variant allele frequency (VAF) may generally be called with higher confidence. Many of the indel calling pipelines had good performance. Some of them performed generally well across all three oncopanels, while others were better for a specific oncopanel. The performance of indel calling can further be improved by restricting the calls within high confidence intervals (HCIs) and coding regions, and by excluding low complexity regions (LCR) regions. Certain VAF cut-offs could be applied according to the applications.

Synthetic Health Data Can Augment Community Research Efforts to Better Inform the Public During Emerging Pandemics.

The COVID-19 pandemic had disproportionate effects on the Veteran population due to the increased prevalence of medical and environmental risk factors. Synthetic electronic health record (EHR) data can help meet the acute need for Veteran population-specific predictive modeling efforts by avoiding the strict barriers to access, currently present within Veteran Health Administration (VHA) datasets. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the VHA launched the precisionFDA COVID-19 Risk Factor Modeling Challenge to develop COVID-19 diagnostic and prognostic models; identify Veteran population-specific risk factors; and test the usefulness of synthetic data as a substitute for real data. The use of synthetic data boosted challenge participation by providing a dataset that was accessible to all competitors. Models trained on synthetic data showed similar but systematically inflated model performance metrics to those trained on real data. The important risk factors identified in the synthetic data largely overlapped with those identified from the real data, and both sets of risk factors were validated in the literature. Tradeoffs exist between synthetic data generation approaches based on whether a real EHR dataset is required as input. Synthetic data generated directly from real EHR input will more closely align with the characteristics of the relevant cohort. This work shows that synthetic EHR data will have practical value to the Veterans' health research community for the foreseeable future.

PrecisionFDA Truth Challenge V2: Calling variants from short and long reads in difficult-to-map regions.

The precisionFDA Truth Challenge V2 aimed to assess the state of the art of variant calling in challenging genomic regions. Starting with FASTQs, 20 challenge participants applied their variant-calling pipelines and submitted 64 variant call sets for one or more sequencing technologies (Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Submissions were evaluated following best practices for benchmarking small variants with updated Genome in a Bottle benchmark sets and genome stratifications. Challenge submissions included numerous innovative methods, with graph-based and machine learning methods scoring best for short-read and long-read datasets, respectively. With machine learning approaches, combining multiple sequencing technologies performed particularly well. Recent developments in sequencing and variant calling have enabled benchmarking variants in challenging genomic regions, paving the way for the identification of previously unknown clinically relevant variants.

Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy.

In contrast to the conventional radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy paradigms used in the treatment of majority of cancer types, this review will describe two areas of radiobiology, hyperfractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy, for cancer treatment focusing on application of novel concepts underlying these treatment modalities. The initial part of the review discusses the phenomenon of hyper-radiation sensitivity (HRS) at lower doses (0.1 to 0.6 Gy), describing the underlying mechanisms and how this could enhance the effects of chemotherapy, particularly, in hyperfractionated settings. The second part examines the radiobiological/physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of high-dose hypofractionated radiation therapy that can be exploited for tumor cure. These include abscopal/bystander effects, activation of immune system, endothelial cell death and effect of hypoxia with re-oxygenation. These biological properties along with targeted dose delivery and distribution to reduce normal tissue toxicity may make high-dose hypofractionation more effective than conventional radiation therapy for treatment of advanced cancers. The novel radiation physics based methods that take into consideration the tumor volume to be irradiated and normal tissue avoidance/tolerance can further improve treatment outcome and post-treatment quality of life. In conclusion, there is enough evidence to further explore novel avenues to exploit biological mechanisms from hyper-fractionation by enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy that could enhance tumor control and use imaging and technological advances to reduce toxicity.